Onlay compared

Onlay compared

Onlay next to the tools people already use for feedback, and when each one is the better choice.

For agents: this page as Markdown · llms.txt

• Onlay vs Claude Code shared artifacts
  Claude Code can publish an HTML or Markdown artifact to a claude.ai link and read comments from your organisation. How that compares with Onlay, and when each is the better choice.
• Onlay vs Google Docs for reviewing agent-written documents
  Pasting your agent's report into Google Docs gets you comments and suggestions, but loses the HTML. When a Google Doc is the better home, and when Onlay is.
• Onlay vs Notion for sharing agent output
  Notion is a good home for a team's wiki and can now read comments through its MCP server. When an agent's page belongs in Notion, and when it belongs on Onlay.
• Onlay vs Vercel preview comments
  Vercel's toolbar puts comments on preview deployments, and Vercel's MCP server lets an agent read and resolve them. When that is the better fit, and when Onlay is.
• Onlay vs website feedback tools (BugHerd, Marker.io, Pastel, Markup.io)
  BugHerd, Marker.io, Pastel, Markup.io and others put comments on a live website, and several now have MCP servers. How they differ from Onlay, and when each fits.
• Onlay vs static HTML hosts (tiiny.host, Netlify Drop, GitHub Pages)
  tiiny.host, Netlify Drop, GitHub Pages and surge put an HTML file online. None of them collect feedback. When plain hosting is all you need, and when it is not.
• Onlay vs Proof by Every
  Proof lets an agent share Markdown and read readers' comments and suggestions back through an HTTP API. How it compares with Onlay, and when each fits.